Sherlocked Security – Secure SDLC Consulting
Integrate Security Best Practices Throughout the Software Development Lifecycle
1. Statement of Work (SOW)
Service Name: Secure Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Consulting
Client Type: SaaS Companies, Financial Institutions, Enterprises, Government Projects
Service Model: SDLC Security Gap Analysis + Strategy + Implementation Support
Compliance Coverage: ISO 27001, NIST 800-218 (SSDF), OWASP SAMM, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, GDPR
Security Integration Focus:
- Requirements Gathering
- Secure Architecture & Design
- Threat Modeling
- Secure Coding Practices
- Secure CI/CD Implementation
- Security Testing Planning
- DevSecOps Enablement
- Governance & Metrics
2. Our Approach
[Discovery & Gap Analysis] → [Secure SDLC Framework Definition] → [Security Integration into SDLC] → [Developer Enablement & Tooling] → [CI/CD Security Controls] → [Ongoing Governance]
3. Methodology
[Assess Current SDLC Processes] → [Threat Modeling Integration] → [Static/Dynamic/Composition Testing Strategy] → [Toolchain Mapping] → [CI/CD Gate Setup] → [Developer Training] → [Final Report & Roadmap]
4. Deliverables to the Client
- Secure SDLC Gap Assessment Report
- Customized Secure SDLC Framework
- Threat Modeling Templates & Guidelines
- CI/CD Security Integration Plan
- Developer Secure Coding Handbook
- DevSecOps Maturity Report
- Implementation Roadmap
- Final Advisory Report & Metrics Dashboard
- Live Walkthrough Call (Optional)
- Post-implementation Review + Certificate
5. What We Need from You (Client Requirements)
- Access to current SDLC and CI/CD documentation
- Stakeholders from Development, Security, and DevOps
- Access to code repositories and pipelines (read-only)
- Inventory of current security tools
- NDA and Scope approval prior to project start
6. Tools & Technology Stack
- GitHub / GitLab / Bitbucket
- Jenkins / CircleCI / Azure DevOps
- SonarQube / Fortify / Checkmarx (SAST)
- OWASP ZAP / Burp Suite / Postman (DAST)
- Snyk / Mend / Dependency-Check (SCA)
- Gitleaks / TruffleHog (Secrets Scanning)
- ThreatModeler / IriusRisk / Microsoft TMT
- Terraform & Kubernetes Security Linters
- Docker / Trivy / Grype / kube-hunter
7. Engagement Lifecycle
1. Discovery Call → 2. SDLC Assessment → 3. Strategy & Framework Design → 4. CI/CD Integration Phase (4–8 weeks) → 5. Developer Enablement & Tooling → 6. Final Report + Metrics Dashboard → 7. Governance Handoff + Retrospective
8. Why Sherlocked Security?
Feature | Sherlocked Advantage |
---|---|
Secure by Design | Embeds security into design, not just testing |
DevSecOps Native | Built for Agile, DevOps, and Continuous Delivery |
Threat Modeling Integration | Embedded early in planning and design |
Security Automation Ready | Supports shift-left security with automation |
Full-Stack Visibility | Covers app code, infra-as-code, containers, APIs |
Developer Enablement | Training, playbooks, and secure coding practices |
Metrics-Driven Governance | Tracks defect density, mean time to remediation |
9. Real-World Case Studies
Financial Services: SDLC Compliance Transformation
Issue: Fragmented DevSecOps practices and lack of traceability across pipelines.
Impact: Failing compliance audits and repeated vulnerabilities in releases.
Our Role: Implemented secure SDLC framework, introduced automated SAST/DAST, trained developers.
Outcome: 60% reduction in security bug backlog; passed SOC 2 & ISO audits.
SaaS Platform: CI/CD Security Integration
Client: VC-funded B2B SaaS company
Findings: No security gates in CI/CD, hardcoded secrets in codebase.
Outcome: Integrated SAST/SCA/Secrets Detection, enforced secrets policy, adopted OWASP SAMM KPIs.
10. SOP – Standard Operating Procedure
- Discovery & Stakeholder Interviews
- SDLC Process Mapping
- Threat Modeling Framework Deployment
- CI/CD Security Toolchain Evaluation
- Security Gate Setup in Pipelines
- Developer Training & Secure Coding Guidelines
- Policy & Governance Documentation
- Metrics Dashboard Deployment
- Final Report with Roadmap
- Closure & Continuous Monitoring Plan
11. SDLC Security Checklist
1. Planning & Requirements
- Security requirements documented
- Regulatory requirements identified
- Data classification completed
- Security acceptance criteria defined
2. Architecture & Design
- Threat models created for major components
- Secure design patterns reviewed
- Attack surface reduction strategies applied
- Third-party service risks assessed
3. Development
- Secure coding standards enforced
- Secrets scanning integrated in IDE/commit
- Pre-commit hooks for code linting and checks
- Static analysis tools run automatically
4. Testing
- Automated unit and security test coverage reviewed
- SAST/DAST/SCA tool integration verified
- Manual security testing for critical features
- Vulnerability remediation tracking in backlog
5. Deployment
- Secrets management (e.g., Vault, AWS Secrets) in place
- Infrastructure as Code (IaC) reviewed for misconfigurations
- Container image scanning and policy enforcement
- Role-based access and deployment controls enforced
6. Monitoring & Feedback
- Application logs monitored for anomalies
- DAST integrated in staging/production
- Security metrics (MTTR, vulnerabilities by category) tracked
- Feedback loop from security incidents to SDLC improvement